Sunday, 11 August 2013

Big Bang In Antarctica -- Killer Crater Found Under Ice

Big Bang In Antarctica -- Killer Crater Found Under Ice

OSU News Research Archive
Search an archive of past research stories.
Coverage of OSU Research
Reports on national news coverage of university research.
Research Communications Staff
Who we are and what we do.

(Last updated 6/1/06)
Previous stories pertaining to Professor von Frese's research:
Editor's note: Images below depicting the mascon and crater are availablehere or from Pam Frost Gorder.


Ancient mega-catastrophe paved way for the dinosaurs, spawned Australian continent
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Planetary scientists have found evidence of a meteor impact much larger and earlier than the one that killed the dinosaurs -- an impact that they believe caused the biggest mass extinction in Earth's history.
The 300-mile-wide crater lies hidden more than a mile beneath the East Antarctic Ice Sheet. And the gravity measurements that reveal its existence suggest that it could date back about 250 million years -- the time of the Permian-Triassic extinction, when almost all animal life on Earth died out.
Ralph von Frese
Its size and location -- in the Wilkes Land region of East Antarctica, south of Australia -- also suggest that it could have begun the breakup of theGondwana supercontinent by creating the tectonic rift that pushed Australia northward.
Scientists believe that the Permian-Triassic extinction paved the way for the dinosaurs to rise to prominence. The Wilkes Land crater is more than twice the size of the Chicxulub crater in the Yucatan peninsula, which marks the impact that may have ultimately killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. The Chicxulub meteor is thought to have been 6 miles wide, while the Wilkes Land meteor could have been up to 30 miles wide -- four or five times wider.
"This Wilkes Land impact is much bigger than the impact that killed the dinosaurs, and probably would have caused catastrophic damage at the time," said Ralph von Frese, a professor of geological sciences at Ohio State University.
He and Laramie Potts, a postdoctoral researcher in geological sciences, led the team that discovered the crater. They collaborated with other Ohio State and NASA scientists, as well as international partners from Russia and Korea. They reported their preliminary results in a recent poster session at the American Geophysical Union Joint Assemblymeeting in Baltimore.
The scientists used gravity fluctuations measured by NASA's GRACE satellites to peer beneath Antarctica's icy surface, and found a 200-mile-wide plug of mantle material -- a mass concentration, or "mascon" in geological parlance -- that had risen up into the Earth's crust.
Mascons are the planetary equivalent of a bump on the head. They form where large objects slam into a planet's surface. Upon impact, the denser mantle layer bounces up into the overlying crust, which holds it in place beneath the crater.

"If I saw this same mascon signal on the moon, I'd expect to see a crater around it. When we looked at the ice-probing airborne radar, there it was. There are at least 20 impact craters this size or larger on the moon, so it is not surprising to find one here. The active geology of the Earth likely scrubbed its surface clean of many more."

When the scientists overlaid their gravity image with airborne radar images of the ground beneath the ice, they found the mascon perfectly centered inside a circular ridge some 300 miles wide -- a crater easily large enough to hold the state of Ohio.
Taken alone, the ridge structure wouldn't prove anything. But to von Frese, the addition of the mascon means "impact." Years of studying similar impacts on the moon have honed his ability to find them.
"If I saw this same mascon signal on the moon, I'd expect to see a crater around it," he said. "And when we looked at the ice-probing airborne radar, there it was."
"There are at least 20 impact craters this size or larger on the moon, so it is not surprising to find one here," he continued. "The active geology of the Earth likely scrubbed its surface clean of many more."
He and Potts admitted that such signals are open to interpretation. Even with radar and gravity measurements, scientists are only just beginning to understand what's happening inside the planet. Still, von Frese said that the circumstances of the radar and mascon signals support their interpretation.
"We compared two completely different data sets taken under different conditions, and they matched up," he said.
To estimate when the impact took place, the scientists took a clue from the fact that the mascon is still visible.
"On the moon, you can look at craters, and the mascons are still there," von Frese said. "But on Earth, it's unusual to find mascons, because the planet is geologically active. The interior eventually recovers and the mascon goes away." He cited the very large and much older Vredefort crater in South Africa that must have once had a mascon, but no evidence of it can be seen now.
"Based on what we know about the geologic history of the region, this Wilkes Land mascon formed recently by geologic standards -- probably about 250 million years ago," he said. "In another half a billion years, the Wilkes Land mascon will probably disappear, too."
Approximately 100 million years ago, Australia split from the ancient Gondwana supercontinent and began drifting north, pushed away by the expansion of a rift valley into the eastern Indian Ocean. The rift cuts directly through the crater, so the impact may have helped the rift to form, von Frese said.
But the more immediate effects of the impact would have devastated life on Earth.
"All the environmental changes that would have resulted from the impact would have created a highly caustic environment that was really hard to endure. So it makes sense that a lot of life went extinct at that time," he said.
He and Potts would like to go to Antarctica to confirm the finding. The best evidence would come from the rocks within the crater. Since the cost of drilling through more than a mile of ice to reach these rocks directly is prohibitive, they want to hunt for them at the base of the ice along the coast where the ice streams are pushing scoured rock into the sea. Airborne gravity and magnetic surveys would also be very useful for testing their interpretation of the satellite data, they said.
NSF and NASA funded this work. Collaborators included Stuart Wells and Orlando Hernandez, graduate students in geological sciences at Ohio State; Luis Gaya-Piqué and Hyung Rae Kim, both of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center; Alexander Golynsky of the All-Russia Research Institute for Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean; and Jeong Woo Kim and Jong Sun Hwang, both of Sejong University in Korea.
Contact: Ralph von Frese, (614) 292-5635;
Laramie Potts, (614) 292-7365;
Written by Pam Frost Gorder, (614) 292-9475;

Monday, 5 August 2013

Shark Week Gets the “Mermaids” Treatment | Ya Like Dags?

Shark Week Gets the “Mermaids” Treatment | Ya Like Dags? 

Shark Week Gets the “Mermaids” Treatment

So I’m settled in to enjoy this year’s Shark Week, my second favorite shark-related time of the year (AES having taken over at first), and notice with some trepidation that the week is kicking off with a “documentary” on modern day attacks by Carcharocles megalodonMegalodon was a 50-60-foot member of the mackerel shark family (great whites, porbeagles, and makos being the best-known modern members) that regularly attacked and consumed whales and is now very much extinct.   The premise of tonight’s Shark Week programming was that these giant sharks have been hiding out in the deep sea, waiting for the right combination of climate change, geological events, and whale populations to re-emerge and start munching on the occasional fishing boat.  Basically, Discovery saw the reaction to the two Mermaids mockumentaries and the lesson they learned was that they need more of that.
 Here’s the promo for the kick-off to Shark Week, titled “Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives:”
As a lifelong shark nerd and current shark researcher-in-training, I can assure you that Megalodon, as awesome as it was, is no longer with us.  The overwhelming evidence that this shark is peacefully extinct has been covered elsewhere, and suffice to say a 50-foot shark that inhabits shallow water and attacks whales would probably have been noticed before now.  Megalodon is a really cool species for sure, but we have plenty of amazing shark species currently swimming in the world’s oceans.  There’s the leaping, superpredatory great white (a species that Shark Week devotes most of its time to already), the highly migratory and omnivorous tiger shark, the sand tiger, which cannibalizes its own siblings in the womb, the bull shark, which swims up rivers, the various hammerhead species with their fancy headgear, the whip-tailed thresher shark, dogfish sharks that swarm in the thousands, lantern sharks that glow in the freakin’ dark… All of these species would make for great footage, but instead Shark Week devoted its two-hour premiere to a completely fictional story about an extinct species. 

 Shared by Aesir Shark

Saturday, 3 August 2013




Shared publicly  -  1:29 AM
Add a comment...

Ana Melo

Discussion  -  Yesterday 7:10 PM
Your mind is a garden
Eva Hsu's profile photoLisa Honey's profile photoHanan Anam's profile photoElisa Gauthreaux's profile photo
Angela Derzaph
1:12 AM
+George West. Quick question.. How often are you called, 'North,' now? 
Add a comment...

Hugh Jackman

Shared publicly  -  Yesterday 8:01 PM
"We had this incredible new canvas of Japan. We had Samurais, we had a whole new palette to work with." Hugh on The Wolverine
Lux Ferre's profile photoKeoki Wallace's profile photoRamon Wignall's profile photoJorie Coe's profile photo
I saw the movie, it was awesome. I recommend you go see it.
Are those knives in the movie graphics
Add a comment...

Marques Brownlee

Shared publicly  -  Yesterday 7:48 PM
How I picture every cat on #Caturday

Side note - I've been blown away by the response to my latest video Explaining the Moto X features - check it out of you haven't already! Moto X Features: Explained!
olivia Sibley's profile photoMykeesha Taylor's profile photoShikhar Tyagi's profile photostephanie Cruz's profile photo
wOW that's some cute cat*
James Lucas
3:25 AM
Well deserved. You explain things really well. Concise, accurate and entertaining. My whole family enjoys your videos. 
Add a comment...

Suggested communities

View all

Aesir Shark

Shared publicly  -  3:55 AM
Morning Everyone

Add a comment...

Freyr Titan

Shared publicly  -  12:56 AM